447 points by dvrp 4 days ago | 118 comments | View on ycombinator
hedora 3 days ago |
BryantD 3 days ago |
mcpar-land 3 days ago |
rarisma 3 days ago |
It just reads like a clunky low quality article
alfgrimur 2 days ago |
semiquaver 2 days ago |
bpiche 2 days ago |
ThinkBeat 2 days ago |
brcmthrowaway 3 days ago |
fedeb95 2 days ago |
initialg 2 days ago |
ghm2199 2 days ago |
vladiim 2 days ago |
undefined 1 day ago |
bilater 1 day ago |
jarboot 2 days ago |
schmuckonwheels 3 days ago |
segalord 2 days ago |
brcmthrowaway 3 days ago |
krunck 3 days ago |
lysace 3 days ago |
cowhax 3 days ago |
I'd say the nonprofit has found itself a profitable reason for its existence
I suspect having a few different teams competing (for funding) to provide mirrors would rapidly reduce the hardware cost too.
The density + power dissipation numbers quoted are extremely poor compared to enterprise storage. Hardware costs for the enterprise systems are also well below AWS (even assuming a short 5 year depreciation cycle on the enterprise boxes). Neither this article nor the vendors publish enough pricing information to do a thorough total cost of ownership analysis, but I can imagine someone the size of IA would not be paying normal margins to their vendors.