29 points by uticus 5 days ago | 26 comments | View on ycombinator
skywal_l about 11 hours ago |
harshreality about 10 hours ago |
No RPN. Every modern graphing calculator needs a mode (doesn't have to be the default) with RPN and a visible (4+ entry) stack. Once people actually learn how to use that for rapid, efficient calculations, they won't go back, but they never learn because all the major calculators don't even offer it as an alternate mode. That's the killer app for "graphing" calculators, because they can show multiple stack entries.
RPN may not be useful for math classes, which tend not to have as many problems involving many sequential calculations, but it's extremely valuable for science and engineering.
exmadscientist about 12 hours ago |
mayoff about 12 hours ago |
t-3 about 12 hours ago |
fasterik about 10 hours ago |
I mostly remember playing games on my TI-84 in high school. We used it in class maybe once or twice. None of my college classes allowed graphing calculators on tests, so ironically I had to buy a "dumb" calculator even though I owned the fancy one.
natas about 11 hours ago |
craftkiller about 7 hours ago |
Seems only superficially cheaper than the TI-84 ($89 vs $112)
jared0x90 about 12 hours ago |
speedgoose about 12 hours ago |
Does it have a CAS?
soumyaskartha about 12 hours ago |
andyfilms1 about 11 hours ago |
Bear with me if you’ve already seen this comment, but I dug out my old TI-89 a while ago for some reason, and all I had to do was plug in four AAA batteries and it worked.
If it had been fitted with a rechargeable battery, 30 years ago, even assuming it was still functional, I would have needed to recharge it... but with what?
Now we have USB-C rechargeable AA/AAA batteries, so there’s really no excuse.