15 points by ck2 1 day ago | 9 comments | View on ycombinator
nerdsniper about 24 hours ago |
abeppu about 22 hours ago |
Rather than complain about how these things have not yet gone through real experiments and are marketed as having been "studied" rather than "effective", I would love to see society use the obvious demand for some of these to actually test them.
k4rli about 22 hours ago |
I have read about BPC-157 and TB-500 in past. They're also banned as PEDs in competition. For injury recovery there is plenty of good feedback online. If not for the method of administration (only effective as subq; would prefer capsule or cream) I would've tried them out for a muscle injury recovery.
GuestFAUniverse about 22 hours ago |
Well, must be the brain damage of years of drinking.
So, sure, you can have a version of the Olympics that has a lower bar than the official Olympics, but much like arguing whether someone would consider prostituting themselves or not ... now you're just debating where the optimum line is for allowed vs. disallowed PEDs. That wouldn't be a radical change over the current Olympics, where the line is "give your athletes PEDs, but just make sure they pass the testing".
Society may at some point be willing to watch people die with regularity in athletic theatrics, but we're currently a long way from accepting gladiatorial combat in modern coliseums.