362 points by predkambrij about 7 hours ago | 198 comments | View on ycombinator
aaddrick about 6 hours ago |
Retr0id about 7 hours ago |
splwjs about 2 hours ago |
shanewei about 7 hours ago |
ok_major_9889 15 minutes ago |
We give Claude full visibility into your Linux machine, with a JS runtime over the top for building tools.
nullpoint420 about 2 hours ago |
Like... You already use Docker and deploy to K8S... On Linux...
neilv about 3 hours ago |
For software development use of Claude, I'd be happy if the `claude` CLI executable does everything I need, within the Linux KVM VM sandboxes I create for the work, without a desktop client. The cleaner and more trustworthy, the better.
Also, for random interactive use of Claude for asking questions, I use it from my host desktop, sandboxed within the Web browser, and I want that to be well-supported. Someone marketing/product person at an AI company will naturally want to dark-pattern push people towards a proprietary desktop client, but that's one corner of abuse potential that we can still keep in check.
For agentic automation of my host desktop things and the things they have access to... no, thank you, the state of the art is not ready for that.
STELLANOVA 44 minutes ago |
taspeotis about 6 hours ago |
robrain about 6 hours ago |
Lame, I know, but you have to entertain yourself sometimes when the only thing anybody talks about here is ruddy spicy autocorrect and self-inflicted job destruction.
btown about 1 hour ago |
(Some for different aspects of full stack features, some for managing specific client situations advised by the codebase and its tools!)
The CLI is not designed to be lightweight, and it’s easy to get into situations where every CLI session consumes multiple GB of memory alone - stack them up and it’s a lot!
And not all terminal GUIs handle multiple tabs well enough to see all sessions at a glance.
So on top of the plugin features, desktop is a really useful thing to have!
skeledrew about 7 hours ago |
999900000999 about 1 hour ago |
You build it for Ubuntu , people will demand fedora. Build fedora they’ll want Arch.
This is fine for FOSS projects where the community can fork and contribute, but as a company I can imagine tons of support tickets coming from Linux users who’s particularly DE/Distro permutation isn’t working right.
Still. An App Image would be nice
ljlolel about 2 hours ago |
I know Claude is electron now but if they made it native swift on macos then they could use this
himhckr about 4 hours ago |
xacky about 1 hour ago |
undefined about 2 hours ago |
ddosmax556 about 3 hours ago |
zoba about 6 hours ago |
bcherny about 1 hour ago |
2OEH8eoCRo0 about 4 hours ago |
"It'll make software easy and replace all software jobs!"
"Sorry, a Linux client is too hard and too much work!"
majorbugger about 2 hours ago |
shmoil about 6 hours ago |
Here, fixed it for you.
pacificat0r about 4 hours ago |
kentf about 5 hours ago |
Supports linux :)
predkambrij about 7 hours ago |
bytepursuits about 5 hours ago |
JSeiko about 6 hours ago |
jeremyjh about 6 hours ago |
rtk_asp about 4 hours ago |
I no longer know if this is a real person who is simping for Anthropic and will be ultimately enslaved by Anthropic or if this is an Anthropic ad to have "proof" for the high demand of their services.
cyanydeez about 6 hours ago |
trumpdong about 4 hours ago |
dahkenangnon about 7 hours ago |
dstnn about 5 hours ago |
coretx about 6 hours ago |
JohnHaugeland about 6 hours ago |
LoganDark about 2 hours ago |
shevy-java about 4 hours ago |
There is already way too much slop.
d1553636d about 1 hour ago |
knightops_dev about 3 hours ago |
znpy about 6 hours ago |
I manage the unofficial build at https://github.com/aaddrick/claude-desktop-debian
Debian is in the name, but scope has grown to all backends, compositors, etc.
The main reason must companies don't publish Linux electron apps is fragmentation. If you're doing anything more than rendering a webpage as an app, it starts to get complicated. I've got a bank of VM's setup for testing, and I still need it up.