105 points by iamsyr 5 days ago | 35 comments | View on ycombinator
jdw64 5 days ago |
WhitneyLand 5 days ago |
One way to think about competitive analysis is bulk discounts. In life we’re constantly having to choose between quantity and discount. We could buy 1 item for a higher price, or say quantity 5 or 10 to get better discounts. The problem comes when we don’t know in advance exactly how many we’re going to need.
What should be our strategy for choosing how many to buy, and whatever the strategy is how well does it compare with having perfect knowledge upfront?
fofoz 5 days ago |
JohnKemeny 5 days ago |
I wonder what Papadimitriou thinks about getting dedicated LLM generated proofs.
jdw64 5 days ago |
But it's really fascinating.
axionbraid 5 days ago |
simonedepertis 5 days ago |
gwt4life 5 days ago |
It appears to be relatively good at problems where finding the initial answer is difficult, but verifying whether a candidate answer is correct is easy. In particular, AI feels very strong in matching-type problems, almost like fuzz testing. As seen in Terence Tao's conversations, it has a massive advantage in rapidly substituting and testing various models.
Given these strengths, I feel it would be highly effective for problems like the Hadamard matrix of order 668, the Lonely Runner conjecture, and the Graceful Tree conjecture.
Perhaps the unsolved problems I mentioned will be cracked in the near future? It is fascinating.